Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
You 'spittle-flecked' (your Priest's words) out, "But you must grasp that in Mary's case, her virginal and maternal body could not belong to two: her exclusive fidelity must be to Him Whose Son she bore." You command we must grasp? Such arrogance! You assume that which is in debate and tell us we MUST GRASP? Will it EVER sink into your catholiciism drenched brain that MARY WAS BETROTHED TO JOPSEPH, FIRST? Mary consenting to be the surrogate Mother to The Son Of God does not convey the 'bloodline dogma' needed for the Catholic LIE of demigoddess status for the Mother of Jesus, so oyu reject the obvious to swallow the lies!
504 posted on 05/20/2017 8:37:48 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

We’re done.


506 posted on 05/20/2017 8:47:27 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson