[ealgeone]

Adding chapters and verses can change meaning in certain verses. So can translating into English.

I only use the chapter/verses for reference. If one understands the context of the passage chapter/verse are meaningless.

Regarding #593, I'm familiar with the CE, as well as strong arguments for the opposite position.

It's not just an opposite position....the CE denies any Scriptural support for the IC.

[Fedora]

The chapters and verses can affect where you interpret punctuation marks to be in certain passages. A good example of this is the transition between Ephesians 3:1 and 3:2, which some commentators interpret as the end of a full sentence while others interpret as the start of a long digression.

”It's not just an opposite position....the CE denies any Scriptural support for the IC.”: That would be an opposite position, and it is a debatable position the CE is taking there; I have seen solid scholars argue both sides of the issue. But your statement was not merely that some commentators today dispute the Vulgate translation of Genesis 3:15; you claimed that the Catholic Church “have been doing it for millennia, even changing the wording in Genesis to support Mariology Mythology”; and I pointed out that this is not historically why Genesis 3:15 has been rendered in different ways--Jerome’s rationale for rendering the Vulgate the way he did was based on comparing variations in ancient manuscript traditions, not because he was changing Scripture to support Mariological assumptions.