Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueDragon
I don't have a serious problem with “Mother of God,” because I think that mothers are not sources. They contribute SOME, not all, of what the child has for genetics etc.

I much prefer “God-bearer” and “Theotokos.”

While I would say that “apostolic tradition” and “[merely or simply] human tradition” do not exhaust the possibilities, I do get fretful at the excessive claims of my co-religionists. I think it's a fine prayer. It's clearly an old prayer. I don't need it to be from the Didache or earlier. And, just as you say, third century ain't apostolic.

My go-to brief Marian prayer is coming up on 200 years old. My favorite longer Marian prayer is not 1k years old. Though I'm grateful for the clarifications and titles of Ephesus and Chalcedon, I haven't based my decision about the intercession of the saints or which prayers I like on their age. I hope you are well.

436 posted on 05/02/2017 11:13:16 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Sta, si cum canibus magnis currere non potes, in portico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg

I prefer *mother of Jesus* because that’s how God, the Holy Spirit, chose to identify her.

If HE thought it was a better term, I don’t have any doubt He would have used it.

But He didn’t.


438 posted on 05/03/2017 5:07:31 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson