To: ealgeone; metmom; Zuriel
I wonder if we are all considered "anti-Catholic" because we dispute some teachings of the Roman Catholic church even when the use of that term is prohibited by the Religion Forum rules? Is one capable of being anti-Catholicism without being anti-Catholic? I have no personal animosity against individual Catholics. And why isn't the accuser considered anti-Protestant/anti-any-Christian-who-isn't-a-Catholic when attacking individual non-Catholic Christians rather than being anti-Protestantism? I'd say that is a double standard. Either way, it's hard to imagine anyone being won to the Roman Catholic view by the snarky, negative and bellicose words of a few here. Salt and light, amigos.
380 posted on
03/17/2017 9:53:57 PM PDT by
boatbums
(God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
To: Syncro
381 posted on
03/17/2017 9:55:36 PM PDT by
boatbums
(God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
To: boatbums
And why isn't the accuser considered anti-Protestant/anti-any-Christian-who-isn't-a-Catholic when attacking individual non-Catholic Christians rather than being anti-Protestantism? The irony is not lost.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson