I do not read Hebrew, but could have posted something along those lines HOURS AGO...showing as you did Hebrew text for "woman" (as that translates into English, anyway) and the additional character which signifies a definitive article.
I could have also provided a link to a Hebrew grammar page http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Grammar/Unit_Four/The_Definite_Article/the_definite_article.html etc., in order to save others loads of time, so we could all move on to other things.
I would have done so, but was wanted to see how far you would try to bluff your way through to an ending point. You may still be trying to sell the idea that you are fluent in Hebrew script. You may EVEN BE fluent in that. Neither condition is, or in any way would be a sin, or something. So why hide whatever it is that is the truth?
But, no. You would not answer a few simple yes/no questions, refusing, first; by omission, then by some degree of half-answers which failed to supply anything much but suggestions in context, as if trying to lead one to make the assumptions you may want them to make... once the "attack the questioner" type of initial dodgy-dodge met firm resistance.
Why is that?
Trying to converse with you on this forum is like I'm a Trey Gowdy, and you're working at doing a Hildabeast imitation.
Wait until he starts using the hard for old eyes to read light blue text! His subtle means of insult even when asked to use a more readable color.