Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: armydoc

Nonsense.

You are promoting an anti-Catholic cartoon of “papal infallibility.”


49 posted on 08/27/2016 5:39:30 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan
This isn't about infallibility. Papal infallibility, while certainly a problem for protestants in theory, has become a practical non-issue in the modern age, simply because it hasn't been invoked for over 60 years and probably won't be invoked again. So, the average Catholic is required to employ considerable interpretation to modern (fallible) papal teachings, comparing them to fallible historical teachings such as the CCC. Perhaps you could help clear this up for me by referring me to the definitive list of infallible, binding Catholic teachings. Surely it exists.

As far as your practical sedevacantism, there really is no other way to accurately describe your position. By your own admission, you "ignore" him and advise others to do the same. Ignore, as in act as if he doesn't exist. The chair is empty in a practical sense.
50 posted on 08/27/2016 6:49:48 AM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson