Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: csivils

“I’m someone who will call you a hypocrite”

Sure you will. That’s next in the Alinsky playbook.

“for making a disagreement personal”

Don’t come the great ponce with me, melad. You and the others with you have been offensive since the first post.

“after calling others out for what you considered Alinsky tactics.”

Oh, you do keep reaching for those straws.

It is long past time for decent people to wake up and realize that when dealing with scumbags, civility is nothing but a self-imposed handicap. We conservatives are free to say unpleasant things too; unlike Alinskyites, though, we make sure the things we say are true.

“He picked a poor example”

To an intelligent, sane, reasonable man, his example was perfectly fine. An Alinskyite knows that time spent discussing this is time not spent discussing morality, and has no concern for the truth, and so he trolls with ludicrous inventions such as, “He picked a poor example.”

“and your only two choices are that he did it carelessly... or he did it intentionally.”

Since your initial premise has been shown to be dreck, no such choice exists.

“neither of which are”

Neither of which *is.*

“I personally think it was intentional”

No you don’t.

“But buy all means”

But *by* all means.

“keep defending the undeniable”

It’s right there for everyone to read. Did you forget that?

“and I’ll keep posting the same point in response”

What point? You don’t have a point. You have a ridiculous falsehood that is exposed by the very text of the OP. All that people have to do is scroll up and read it.

“Or you could walk away from this one.”

Yes. I’m not prejudiced against drooling morons per se, but I can only handle so much idiocy at one sitting.


236 posted on 08/15/2016 5:40:03 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: dsc

“You and the others with you have been offensive since the first post.”

Oh really. Here is my first post, please point out what was offensive...

“”Msgr ignored the Brazilian team who wore bodysuits to pick some non-competitive team in a non-competitive uniform. It was not Alinsky to call him out for the poor choice of an example.””

There was nothing offensive about that post. What is offensive is your statement below:

“An Alinskyite knows that time spent discussing this is time not spent discussing morality”

There is a moral aspect to rejecting women being forced to wear burka’s, and the violence sometimes used to enforce that attire. That is why the example was morally offensive to some.

As far as the rest of your nonsense... you can re-correct words my phones auto-correct butchered, or correct my grammar... but what would be really nice is if you could fix the original article.


241 posted on 08/15/2016 6:08:25 PM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson