Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: piusv

There are a number of automatic penalties in canon law, and there are Popes who have issued decrees imposing automatic penalties.

I am pointing out the simple fact that these are MEANINGLESS. The very fact that the penalties are “automatic” means that that the so-called penalty is imposed by—NOBODY.

The same is true in the case of a heretic who is “automatically” not Pope.

Go to Rome. Snatch Bergoglio’s beanie off his head, and proclaim to the crowd that he is not Pope.

SEE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT.


26 posted on 06/26/2016 6:31:13 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan; SGNA
The same is true in the case of a heretic who is “automatically” not Pope.

Except that is not true. A manifest heretic ceases to be pope ipso facto not because of a penalty incurred via canon law, but because of the penalty incurred via divine law.

27 posted on 06/26/2016 6:55:31 PM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson