Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Priest’s Concern About Recent Remarks by the Pope
The National Catholic Register ^ | 6/24/16 | Msgr Charles Pope

Posted on 06/26/2016 5:38:07 AM PDT by marshmallow

I would like to make, as a parish priest in trenches, a few remarks concerning the Pope’s recent statements in Rome at a gathering of priests and seminarians. Others have admirably remarked on his troubling remarks on marriage and cohabitation. I will not add to those. But I would like to focus on two other reported remarks the Pope made about priests to the effect that some of us are cruel, are putting our noses into people’s moral life and possibly that he even called some of us animals.

And while most of these remarks, recorded and widely reported, were not included, or were “adjusted” in the Vatican transcript, they cannot simply be unsaid. And even the clarifications remain troubling.

I write these remarks simply as a parish priest. I am not a canonist and certainly not a reporter. I react simply as a priest to what has been reported all week, and write here the reaction of one man and priest—me.

First, it is reported that the Pope said pastors should not be “putting our noses into the moral life of other people.”

Permit me to state my utter bewilderment at such a notion. As a priest, and especially as a confessor and spiritual director this is my duty! It is true that I am not to unnecessarily pry into the private lives of parishioners. But surely there is a requirement that as a confessor and a pastor I have some sense of the moral life of those to whom I minister.

Consider a medical analogy. Suppose a patient comes to a doctor with breathing difficulties and chest pains. Surely the doctor will inquire as to the person’s lifestyle. Does he smoke? Did he ever smoke? What sort of food is being consumed? Does he exercise? What is.......

(Excerpt) Read more at ncregister.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Arthur McGowan
Well, for starters, those that continue to "recognize" him as pope only help to legitimize his authority and perpetuate the confusion throughout the Catholic world. And in that sense he will remain "pope" and nothing will change.

Perhaps if more and more faithful Catholics (especially the clergy) actually spoke the obvious truth about him, something would change. Not doing so certainly won't bring about change.

Those who sit by and say "there is nothing we can do..boo hoo" are just part of the bigger problem: which is that we don't have a true pope.

41 posted on 06/29/2016 5:16:12 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: piusv

Fair enough.

I think I do my part.

I have said often enough he is a sock puppet of the totalitarians. He mouths the latest line from the U.N. He is for No Borders in Europe and North America. Notice he has nothing to say about any injustices in any non-white country. Not a word about the Rape Culture that includes the entire world EXCEPT where white Christian Europeans have established a culture.

All that matters is that Europe and North America MUST be overwhelmed with Mexicans and Muslims. He repeats the lie that carbon dioxide is a pollutant.

When it comes to anything Catholic, he has nothing to say, unless it’s to undermine the sacraments, moral teachings, etc.

Nightmare: When Bergoglio dies, we get Tagle, that grinning idiot, also a puppet of the NWO.

And WHO appointed ALL the current Cardinals who gave us Bergoglio?

JPII and BXVI.


42 posted on 06/29/2016 8:33:18 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
And WHO appointed ALL the current Cardinals who gave us Bergoglio? JPII and BXVI.

Thanks for making this point. This fact should tell us a lot right there. At the very least it should stop folks from pining for what I call "the savior pope" (aka Ratzinger). He wasn't forced to resign. Enough already. He wasn't forced to resign. He was a willful participant in the up and coming "Bergoglio papacy"(not directing this at you).

43 posted on 06/29/2016 11:27:50 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: piusv

A very well-informed, scholarly friend of mine says, “Ratzinger is a 1950’s liberal.” He was talking specifically about why Ratzinger thought that a resignation was even an option. (Not questioning the reality or validity of the resignation. Even Pius XII signed an instrument of resignation, to be effective in the event of a kidnapping. He said that Hitler “will not have the Pope, but only Pacelli.”)


44 posted on 06/29/2016 2:27:01 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: piusv

It is clearer and clearer that Bergoglio is just one of Obama’s fellow “post turtles.” Totally unqualified, morally unfit, uneducated, not very bright, but willing to mouth any stupid slogan the U.N./E.U./Soros/Goldman Sachs/Morgan Stanley/NWO instructs him to, from “shacking up is a sacrament” to “carbon dioxide is a pollutant.”


45 posted on 06/29/2016 2:55:15 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson