[MHGinTN]

You spittled out, "Your "argument" seems to imply that He's not even human -- more a fabricated simulacrum cunningly devised to appear humanm." No, that is not what the clear thinking of the post is stating, but catholic blindness makes it impossible to see the post any other way, apparently. Would you like top prove to us that GOD had to use a sex cell from MAry? That has with it the corollary of where did the male sex call come from, if you're true to logical argument.

Why do you catholic defenders of the fables on Mary insist on pushing against a srawman like 'Your "argument" seems to imply that He's not even human' ... apparently the catholiciism way or the highway, not even giving GOD enough credit to do what He chooses without first having Vatican approval! [See how easy it is to get in the catholic fantasy / strawman fabrication rut?]

[maryz]

No, that is not what the clear thinking of the post is stating,

The poster claims that Christ got no genetic material from Mary. Therefore, no human genetic material.