Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone

You’re right. His blood was of the New Covenant. He commanded no one to drink His blood under the Old Covenant.


30 posted on 04/19/2016 5:40:23 PM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: piusv
The poster was referencing the Passover. If you want to cite the Passover you have to include the aspect of how the blood was used in the Passover.

It was NOT consumed.

No where in the OT was blood ever consumed.

I've already referenced the Council of Jerusalem's ruling on this bringing this under the New Covenant.

If you want from the New Covenant perspective we can do that also.

Catholics claim the mass is the same sacrifice as the Cross.

Q. 920. Is the Mass the same sacrifice as that of the Cross?

A. The Mass is the same sacrifice as that of the Cross.

Yet they contradict themselves by stating:

Q. 917. What is the Mass?

A. The Mass is the unbloody sacrifice of the body and blood of Christ. http://www.baltimore-catechism.com/lesson24.htm

However, both of these go against the NT teaching on Christ being offered as a ONE TIME sacrifice. There is no need of another on-going sacrifice as taught by catholicism.

And don't just think of the Mass conducted at your local church.

This is happening who knows how many times during just one day around the world. Christ is being sacrificed again and again and again and again, etc.

31 posted on 04/19/2016 5:50:26 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson