Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: verga; Elsie; MHGinTN; HossB86; boatbums; ealgeone; metmom

It was not a ludicrous question, and just a simple yes or no would have sufficed.

Also, when you said, “If you are honest the very most you can say is: ‘There is scriptural backing, we just choose to read/ interpret it differently.’”, you implicitly supported the counter to your argument, since the counter to you argument has always been discussed from scripture, but not as you interpret it. You gave away the store with this statement, as you have allowed the option for other interpretations of the text.


377 posted on 04/19/2016 5:50:23 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]


To: kosciusko51
You gave away the store with this statement, as you have allowed the option for other interpretations of the text

Not to people that view the Bible in it's entirety.

378 posted on 04/19/2016 6:09:53 AM PDT by verga (Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson