Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone

Your comment: “The roman catholic position on the Eucharist is against the OT and the NT”

Again, your personal opinion. Open yourself and see that you reject the words of Jesus and substitute all kinds of false statements.

Just because you say something (and even believe) doesn’t make your comments or opinions truthful.

Read posting 202.

I ask you sincerely why are you so anti-Catholic?

I do hope that you seek the Truth of Jesus.


206 posted on 04/10/2016 1:28:32 PM PDT by ADSUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: ADSUM; ealgeone

And I ask you sincerely why are you so against non Catholic Christians who are believers and followers of Jesus Christ but disagree with you about this Catholic doctrine? Can you not bring yourself to agree to disagree? You condescendedly add, “I do hope that you seek the Truth of Jesus.”, why do you presume someone has not found the truth of Jesus just because they don’t agree with you on the Eucharist?

Do you believe non-Catholic Christians can be saved or are you in disagreement with your own catechism on that as well?


311 posted on 04/10/2016 9:33:14 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

To: ADSUM; ealgeone; boatbums; metmom; MHGinTN; daniel1212; Mark17
There is something we all need to be reminded, and that is that the reason Jesus Messiah instituted the Remembrance had one single purpose, and one only, and that is rhis:

That through His disciples adhering to and maintaining this ordained custom often, that all men everywhere would be reminded that the Person Jesus was/is God come in the flesh, God Present with us as a human in a human body, until He comes back and is again physically seen in the flesh, at which time the Remembrance Supper would be utterly superfluous.

All this attempt to make bread and grape juice something changed, holy, mysterious, manipulated only by some selected cult leaders for their power over credulous ignoramuses is simply just puff, a product of a system meant to snare gullible slaves to be constantly milked of their substance by simony.

And that's what setting up a power stucture over indivduals and external to their local churches is all about. Arguing over consubstantiation and transubstantiation only serves to give these theories the aura of Scriptural legitimacies, which they do not deserve.

I say, if some people in a free society wish to serve the purveyors of these irrational systems, let them do so, until common sense takes charge. But do not keep on arguing with them if they persist despite godly counsel. At that point, arguing with a closed mind is a waste of time when there are others that long to hear the wonderful words of life.

For me, goin

"And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD" (Joshua 244:15 AV).

Believing on the Lord Jesus Christ, and assembling with a local autonomous immersionist Bible-believing Christ-serving fellowship is not all that too difficult; and if it doesn't exist, to start it with other true believers seeking reality in their life with God.

316 posted on 04/11/2016 12:42:07 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson