Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rwa265; metmom; agere_contra
You're being a bit dishonest in what you're posting. You've copied and pasted a small part of what he's written on v2.

Mary is mentioned one time in the analysis of v2. ONE time.

This is what I've see a lot of catholics do....take things completely out of context to establish their position.

I challenge you to post all of the quote.

Much to the catholic chagrin, Ezekiel 44:2 is not about Mary.

134 posted on 03/12/2016 2:35:15 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone; metmom; agere_contra

You’re being a bit dishonest in what you’re posting.


It is not my intent to be dishonest. Metmom asked a valid question and I offered a possible explanation. I quoted only what was pertinent to my explanation because it was such a lengthy quote, most of which provided no context to my explanation. I provided a link so that anyone who was interested in reading the entire quote could easily access it. Here is the link again.

https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/geb/view.cgi?bk=25&ch=44#2


177 posted on 03/12/2016 6:33:10 PM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson