(*sigh*) I’m getting awfully sick and tired of “courageous” bishops being “courageous” about items which could easily have been hand-approved by the DNC, while at the same time being spineless, silent, weak, and/or complicit with issues relating to moral imperatives (e.g. abortion, euthanasia, contraception, orthodoxy in general, etc.)...
Isn’t it odd, how some people are so “brave” about things which will gain them nothing but applause from the world (and/or a condescending smile from people who are smirking at the “useful idiot”)?
"Mine certainly were. They were not only honest but heroic. I asserted them fearlessly. When the doctrine of the Resurrection ceased to commend itself to the critical faculties which God had given me, I openly rejected it. I preached my famous sermon. I defied the whole chapter. I took every risk."
"What risk? What was at all likely to come of it except what actually came-popularity, sales for your books, invitations, and finally a bishopric?"
"Dick, this is unworthy of you. What are you suggesting?"
"Friend, I am not suggesting at all. You see, I know now. Let us be frank. Our opinions were not honestly come by. We simply found ourselves in contact with a certain current of ideas and plunged into it because it seemed modern and successful. At College, you know, we just started automatically writing the kind of essays that got good marks and saying the kind of things that won applause. When, in our whole lives, did we honestly face, in solitude, the one question on which all turned: whether after all the Supernatural might not in fact occur? When did we put up one moment's real resistance to the loss of our faith?"
-C.S. Lewis, The Great Divorce