Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NRx

If they’re against it it’s because they want to keep their homosexual and pedophile club to themselves. Heterosexual priests would be seen as a threat.


5 posted on 02/04/2016 6:03:55 AM PST by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AlaskaErik; NRx
"If they’re against it it’s because they want to keep their homosexual and pedophile club to themselves."

This is bullshorts. Other denominational clergy and other professions (e.g. schoolteachers, youth sports/athletic leaders, theatre and the performing arts mentors) have even more extensive homosexuality and child abuse problems, some of them stemming from their married staff, themselves.

There's no evidence whatsoever that married personnel will fend off these shameful abuses.

7 posted on 02/04/2016 6:54:25 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies when they become fashions." - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AlaskaErik

That’s exactly the opposite of what is happening. Try finding one pro homosexualist catholic who supports things like ‘gay marriage’ and priestesses and abortion who also think the discipline of celibacy is valuable and should be continued. In fact, every liberal of any faith or none seems to invariably hate the Catholic discipline of celibacy and wants in ended.

The conservative Catholics are the ones that seem to find it valuable, at least that I have observed.

Freegards


9 posted on 02/04/2016 7:05:23 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson