[afraidfortherepublic]

My point seems to have sailed right over YOUR head.

The writer said that attacks on male children were “dishonestly labeled as child abuse” when it was really homosexual priests seducing young boys. Well, it’s still child abuse, no matter who is doing it for whatever reason.

[detective]

“The writer said that attacks on male children were "dishonestly labeled as child abuse" when it was really homosexual priests seducing young boys”

Stop lying about what I said.

I said the examples of homosexual priests pursuing young men in their late teens were dishonestly labeled as pedophilia which is sexual abuse of young prepubescent children. I explained that to you but continue to mischaracterize what I said.

I did not defend homosexual priests. Quite the opposite I was critical of them.