Only in you biased mind.
Duh? Why aren't you counting Lot and his two male visitors and and his two future son-in-laws as heterosexuals in your 100% figure?
So Lot went out, and spoke to his sons in law that were to have his daughters, and said: Arise: get you out of this place, because the Lord will destroy this city.Genesis 19:14
Your continued defense of sodomy being no different than immoral heterosexual sex sickens me.
You'd be better at a being a Protestant than a Catholic; seeing the way you cherry pick the Bible to defend sodomy as no worse than immoral heterosexual sex.
P.S. When Adam and Eve were created there were 0% homosexuals.
Those are your words, not mine.
It's you, also, who said "Get real, over 98% of humans are straight."
So I'm just comparing one ebb tide saying with another ebb tide saying. I, myself, didn't say either of these things. I am asking you to explain your apparent contradiction.
As, perhaps you can. Who knows? I'm all ears.
"Your continued defense of sodomy being no different than immoral heterosexual sex sickens me."
This is a truly nutzoid statement. I never "defended" sodomy on any terms whatsoever. What I said, repeatedly, literally, is that it is an abomination, an act of grave depravity, and that it can not under any circumstances be justified.
Please note that heterosexuals commit sodomy, too. There are even male FReepers --- yes, right here on this forum --- who have justified sodomizing their lawful wedded wives. This is damnable, hell-bent, unnatural, comparable in some ways to contraception, sacrilege, and blasphemy. I will not name names. I hope they have left this Forum forever.