Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: The Cuban; metmom; Elsie
No your interpretation is Protestant Gibberish. Nothing in that passage contradicts Catholic doctrine no matter how much you wish it would.

And he knew her not till she brought forth her first born son: and he called his name Jesus.

What interpretation??? It have a third grade Granddaughter who could understand that verse as it's written...It doesn't need any interpretation...

Obviously you mean you don't believe what it says...Or probably you don't care what it says, you go with what your religion wants it to say...

But yes, that verse alone destroys the false idea that Mary was a perpetual virgin...

Doesn't matter how long you hold your hands over your eyes and scream that you can't see it, it means what it says...

1,605 posted on 01/09/2016 11:59:11 AM PST by Iscool (Izlam and radical Izlam are different the same way a wolf and a wolf in sheeps clothing are differen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1530 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool

Selah


1,606 posted on 01/09/2016 12:05:25 PM PST by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1605 | View Replies ]

To: Iscool

That verse yes the rest of the verses that you use to prove protestant heresy, not so much.


1,656 posted on 01/09/2016 3:49:51 PM PST by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1605 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson