Replies

Your comments taken all together, and in context of the back-and-forth of other side of the conversation (my own) is what I was talking about.

Isolating one portion of that, making it out to be as if it was representative of the entirety of what's been going on here may fool yourself, but it's not working with me.

You can go back and restate things, while disavowing the insinuations that you'd been including, or not.

I see that so far you have not. Not one bit, nowhere in this conversation.

Will we be seeing in the future more of the "Protestant are like Muslims" in tending towards physical violence for reason of religion allegation ---as if throughout history Catholics have not been-never were, because they were (and still are, so the insinuations generally run) [allegedly] the only real Christians?

Make it plain. If you are going to live by insinuations, then when those come back to trouble & haunt --- that' not my fault.

I can't make you stop and re-assess just what else it has been that you appeared to be driving at, but only frame what that was, so that we'll all know --- or else things can be clarified.

Again, if your opinions are otherwise than I've been recognizing and identifying those to be, then feel free to clear up any false impressions I may have.

Zeroing in on one isolated comment just ain't working. Not without positive disavowal of the portions I've highlighted that are problematic.

Would it kill you to confess that so-called "Protestants" can do a good job of raising people up within Christian sensibilities --- at least well enough that they do not typically resort to violence over issues foremost being difference of religion and religious sensibilities? They accomplished this without being within realm of Roman Catholicism too. Is that's what's bugging you? That Protestants can be just as good if not better? They certainly can be nearly just as bad, when they are bad, I won't dispute that side of the larger truths of the matter.