To: piusv
You’re going backward from a supposed result to cause. You haven’t explained what it is in post-VII Canon Law that makes it invald. What is the principle that makes Canon Law invalid?
51 posted on
11/23/2015 7:00:14 AM PST by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: sitetest
Why are you pushing this issue? I said I don’t trust it. Why isn’t that enough for you?
52 posted on
11/23/2015 8:50:00 AM PST by
piusv
(The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
To: sitetest
And furthermore, I don’t care enough about HOW this would be done. You want to go with Conclave, go with Conclave. Either way, a heretic pope is no pope at all.
53 posted on
11/23/2015 8:51:53 AM PST by
piusv
(The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson