Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: huldah1776
I understood from the passage in scripture I quoted that in that culture, it It could be said or was taught and believed that women who were barren were not blessed, were stigmatized, were discriminated against, were unequal, were inferior. I think even God called it a reproach but not across the board. Sometimes it was to magnify himself as in Sarah and Elizabeth.

But nobody can get around what is written that Elizabeth addresses Mary as Mother of my Lord and I doubt anyone could argue context. It's pretty clear that that passage means what it says. Furthermore, who could not call her blessed? If they don't believe we should pray to her, then that is what they believe. The bible doesn't say explicitly one way or the other.

So then we get into sola scriptura and go round and round, endlessly, rancorously, and perhaps in the process condemn ourselves..

52 posted on 11/06/2015 4:30:16 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Aliska
But nobody can get around what is written that Elizabeth addresses Mary as Mother of my Lord and I doubt anyone could argue context. It's pretty clear that that passage means what it says.

But who is the LORD that the Jewish, non Christian Elisabeth was referring to??? The bible isn't over 30,000 scriptures long for no reason...

73 posted on 11/07/2015 7:09:04 AM PST by Iscool (Izlam and radical Izlam are different the same way a wolf and a wolf in sheeps clothing are differen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson