Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex

“So we’ve established that every man is a building.”

No. We’ve established the builder is not the building - which is painfully obvious to anyone who reads English. Builders are NOT buildings!

The “You” is the church at Corinth, or the Universal Church - see 1 Cor 1.

“So therefore when the building burns so that only quality material remains, that is the loss for every man.”

Nope. The BUILDING “burns”, and the building is the Church, so the only “loss” is of false works in the church - the tares, so to speak.

The Builder only loses what he never had - a reward for lasting work. But if his work is not lasting, then it is not rewarded.

“The Epistle says “every man’s work”.”

There is an element of stupidity here. The Epistle says:

“For we are God’s fellow workers; you are God’s field, God’s building. According to the grace of God which was given to me, like a wise master builder I laid a foundation, and another is building on it. But each man must be careful how he builds on it.”

“Each man” refers to the subject: “God’s fellow workers” who are working in a field or on a building - take your choice of word pictures.

If I write, “We worked in the field all day. It was hot. Every man sweated.”, that does NOT mean every man in the world sweated from work. “Every” refers back to “We worked in the field”.

But this is elementary reading, something taught in elementary school if not before. A child can read 1 Cor 3 and understand it. It is not complex. But someone who puts a catechism above the word of God MAY need to twist things beyond recognition in order to make the word of God fit the preconceived theology. That is what Catholics must do to make 1 Cor 3 support Purgatory - one must stop reading 1 Cor 3 plainly, and try to distort it beyond recognition.

And frankly, I’m tired of discussing it with you. The language is plain. It is simple. If anyone reads it, they know what it means. If someone reads the Catholic Catechism first, and wants to pretend the Bible supports it, then they must read 1 Cor 3 in a way no one reads a document.


454 posted on 11/09/2015 9:42:47 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

” If someone reads the Catholic Catechism first, and wants to pretend the Bible supports it...”

The source of much of the problem. One is inspired, the other a commentary.


456 posted on 11/09/2015 1:15:29 PM PST by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

Again, several times in the passage the plain text says “you are God’s building” and then “your are a temple of God”. Yes, that allegory co-exists with Paul and Apollo also being builders.

And then that building burns and the man who is the building “suffers loss” and “is saved”.

You don’t like what Paul wrote, write your own epistle.


462 posted on 11/09/2015 7:51:42 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson