The Impractical Catholic’s Guide to Infallibility

Catholic Stand ^ | October 10, 2015 | Anthony S. Layne

[Elsie]

They neither interpret or translate it.

They just DO as they are TOLD...

[Elsie]

Did you ever notice that no one is very interested in either sides caucus posts?

Heck...

...I'm not interested in OUR side's caucus posts!

The choir has heard MANY sermons!

[Elsie]

Just WOMEN?

[Elsie]

How DARE you judge US; like we judge YOU!!

--Catholic_Wannabe_Dude(Hail Mary!!!)

[Elsie]

Is that a MORMON cricket?

[Elsie]

So THAT is where the Jewish synagogues get their Torahs from!

[DungeonMaster]

...I'm not interested in OUR side's caucus posts!

That's what I'm saying. You post a "Mary IS the Mother of God" thread and you'll get 1000 posts. The average caucus thread is about 12 posts because the people for whom they're posted are not interested.

[DungeonMaster]

luke 1:28 And having come in, the angel said to her, “Rejoice, highly favored one, the Lord is with you; blessed are you among women!”

[verga]

I am a Catholic, that is the proof of that statement.

[Not gonna take it anymore]

Actually no.

[caww]

....”most of them sitting in judgment on the pope himself about what kind of job he’s doing and whether he’s even a Catholic”....

Well obviously Metmom those in the Priesthood leadership believe that he’s a bit more than a Christian or he would not have been appointed to Popehood, unless of course the problem is the Priesthood in the first place, which is of course easy for non-catholics to see.

It looks more like the Priesthood has more “infallibility” then the Pope....and the members as much since they do vary on what they believe, although they might say otherwise the facts of how they speak of their leadership attests otherwise.

It’s interesting they have said they’ve lived through “other” bad Popes and will do likewise with Francis. That in itself speaks volumes about Catholic leadership.

[boatbums]

I think that is the whole reason for having a forum in the first place. Those who only jump in for the sole purpose of accusing others of lying (while skating on thin ice of the rules against personal attacks), mocking, deriding and generally sneering and seething with hatred for those who disagree with them are the disrupters who ruin it (or try to) for everyone else. Paul said we should speak the truth in love. Haters should be ignored. They don’t deserve the time of day.

[metmom]

The average caucus thread is about 12 posts because the people for whom they're posted are not interested.

That's presuming a lot, but then again, that sword cuts both ways.

There's an awful lot of Catholic caucus threads that don't have a very high comment count unless the OP spams his or her own thread with 25-30 posts him/herself.

[metmom]

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

It’s proof of NOTHING.

[ealgeone]

But let’s keep in mind it’s not an indicator or readership. I read a lot of threads but may not post on every one.

[MHGinTN]

If we read the assertions accurately, the poster claims to have been a catholic, then a prot, then back to catholiciism. Double-minded maybe?

[metmom]

Exactly.

[MHGinTN]

You make a huge and seriously vacuous assumption that we who are pinged do not read the thread just because we read the material and do not post to the thread ... are you a Mormon or something?

[verga]

I see that your Reading Comp is still missing.