Thank you, BlackElk for the brief trip down memory lane.
It isn’t surprising to find that Latin is what they call a dead language, although it is still plenty useful, and I think the unusual sentence arrangement is what did it in.
Subject, object, predicate seems strange and was difficult for me. I admit I love the English language. For me, it has everything, if used properly.
Thanks again.
P.S. It wasn’t simple for me.
IIRC, Latin actually has few hard and fast rules as to the order of subject, object and predicate. For examples: "Omnia Gallia est in tres partes divisa" places those in the order of simply subject, predicate with no direct object It would have been equally correct for Julius Caesar to have written it as "In tres partes est omnia Gallia divisa." "Arma virumque cano" (I sing of arms and the man) is the more familiar Latin order of direct objects, predicate (implied subject "I" contained in the verb form cano). English is generally more rigid in this respect.
When I attended a Jesuit prep school back when we were busy inventing the wheel, we used a series of four textbooks and a separate grammar book by Robert Henle, S.J., an introduction to Latin prose (I), Caesar's war in Gaul (II), Cicero's orations (III), and Virgil (we actually translated the entire Aeneid rather than using the text in senior year) (IV) and Latin Grammar. These are all still in print from Loyola University Press in Chicago. If you have children or grandchildren to whom you would like to teach Latin, it is a great set of books which uses very good methods to teach Latin.
God bless you and yours!