You have still failed to supply an alternative, feel free to disagree with my position all you want, but you have failed to supply an alternative with ANY proof.
I did supply a scholarly alternative refuting the catholic claim. Did you not read post 172?
Here it is again.
There is, however, no evidence to show that he was the founder of the Roman church, though (along with Paul) he had some connections with it from an early stage.....
Introducing the New Testament, John Drane, Fortress Press Edition 2011, p403.