[Grateful2God]

" And please, no appeal to Luke 1:28 "

Making the rules now? Or is it because:

" Luther ascribed to several books of the New Testament different degrees of doctrinal value: "St. John's Gospel and his first Epistle, St. Paul's Epistles, especially those to the Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, and St. Peter's Epistle-these are the books which show to thee Christ, and teach everything that is necessary and blessed for thee to know, even if you were never to see or hear any other book of doctrine. Therefore, St. James' Epistle is a perfect straw-epistle compared with them, for it has in it nothing of an evangelic kind." Thus Luther was comparing (in his opinion) doctrinal value, not canonical validity. " Luther did not ascribe the same doctrinal value to the other Gospels?

So disregard Luke's account of the Incarnation of Jesus. I cannot choose for you- nor you for me!

G-d ♡ bless you!
Grateful ✟ ✡

[ealgeone]

Catholic apologists admit you cannot look to Luke 1:28 and find the IC there....or anywhere in Scripture. That’s why I said no appeal to Luke.

[ealgeone]

Now we have to bring in Luther! The catholic fall back position. One day he's a good guy, next day he's evil. Poor fellow doesn't know if he's in or out with catholics.