Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: aMorePerfectUnion
If you insist on lumping every non-Roman together and calling them Protestant, I will also call every feminist priest movement, pedophile catholic, gay catholic movement, married priest movement, remarried catholic movement, etc., etc. all CATHOLIC. This would be consistent.

Protestant was a word used to define Christians who were not Catholic...nothing at all wrong with the word nor definition.

The bad ass Catholics are, indeed Catholic, just not very good ones. All....All....All Protestants are either in error or at best incomplete in their Christian following because they are not Catholic, which is the ONLY....ONLY.....ONLY true form of Christianity on Earth.

They, as a group, have been bending the "rules" since their inception. Luther believed in transubstantiation and, in fact, was authorized to say a true Mass. Somewhere along the line they lost the Sacraments, Eucharist,Penance, decided that infants couldn't be baptized, valid marriages could be performed by whoever, Holy Orders could be achieved over the internet or by mail, people could, more or less, determine what Christianity did or didn't teach....on and on and on

349 posted on 08/11/2015 6:53:03 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]


To: terycarl

Pride is the most insidious sin. Those consumed by it haven’t clue to their bankrupt spiritual condition because they believe they are ‘better than that’.


351 posted on 08/11/2015 7:01:22 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]

To: terycarl

terycarl,
I certainly wish you the best. I obviously think your assertions are all wet, but...

I find it admirable on your part.

Many FRomans pretend to have Biblical evidence to support the bogus teachings of they’ve been taught. They try to post facts (usually they miss the mark), they try to post Scriptures (usually without understanding the context) and they will often try to make a rational argument to support what they believe. Instead of just coming out and saying they believe it because they were taught it, they try to backfill it to make it sound as if it was actually taught in the Scriptures.

Not you. It is refreshing.

You just assert what you’ve been taught. You do it forcefully. You do it without facts. You do it without logical argumentation. You do it without evidence. Your posted message is clear: THIS is what I believe because they told me it is true and I accept it all!”

No fakery for you. No obfuscation. Just pure assertion.

Now, we disagree about the things you assert.

I think they are bogus. I’m not required to believe them just because some person in a costume taught them. I obviously cannot find a simple assertion convincing in any way. It would require prebelief in the same source. No surprise there.

Despite this disagreement, I find your honest assertion of what you believe apart from facts refreshing.

I wish you the best.

I also pray the same prayer for you that the Apostle Paul prayed for the Ephesians:

” I keep asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious Father, may give you the Spirit[f] of wisdom and revelation, so that you may know him better. 18 I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened in order that you may know the hope to which he has called you, the riches of his glorious inheritance in his holy people, 19 and his incomparably great power for us who believe.”

best


354 posted on 08/11/2015 7:16:36 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson