Replies

I was enjoying a Catholic caucus.
It was not I who wanted an open forum.
It was not I who infringed without invitation on another group's caucus.
It was not I who closed debate when caucus status was removed, because of my own parameter of certain books of the Bible not being open to discussion.
It was I who presented material relating to that book, and others deemed to be less important, or totally disregarded. That discussion as well was shut down, by terse, unrelated response.

The result:
Caucus shut down;
intelligent responses ignored;
parameters set by non-authorities;
discussion so vehemently insisted upon replaced by sarcasm and lack of topic-related response to posts.

This is one of the reasons why a caucus is a good thing, at least when those outside respect the privileges given to the group involved.

And this is precisely why Catholics need a caucus.

E, your response to my post did not reflect any relevance to it. If you close discussion of Maccabees, and won't respond to my post regarding Luther's bible, where is the discussion? Why break into a caucus if you do not wish to discuss? By what authority do you decide what can and cannot be a topic here?
We've had some interesting discussions, but I have to say, I'm disappointed. That isn't your style.

God bless you, my friend.