Did you even read the comment to which I replied where the commenter flatly stated that there wasn't a Christian in that entire chapter ?
I ask a question about what Christ Himself said with regard to what happens when someone does not produce good fruit and the response was that Christ was only talking to those who weren't yet Christians.
So, in a flat rejection of what Scripture states someone asserts that Christ is in fact a respecter of persons and what Christ states one place is not addressed to all who hear Him.
So, if that's not one Gospel for the Jews and another for the Gentiles, it has to be one Gospel for those who Christ seeks to bring to Him and another for those who already follow Him.
What Christ said now only applies until you believe in Christ at which point each individual chooses which of His words apply to them, is that what Scripture states ?
Any way someone tries to spin the comment to which I replied, that assertion means there is more than one Gospel which is without a doubt not in keeping with what Christ and the Apostles taught and what Scripture states.
Is it sarcasm to ask someone exactly what they believe Christ means by what Christ said in Scripture ?
Is it sarcasm to ask someone why they avoid that question ?
Is it sarcasm to point out that someone made a statement that directly contradicts Scripture ?
Is it sarcasm point out that someone who accepts the words of Pharisee Rabbis as true rather than believing that the Holy Spirit guided the Apostles to all truth as Christ said the Holy Spirit would is blaspheming the Holy Spirit as being imperfect along with stating that what Christ said the Holy Spirit would do did not happen ?
Just what do you see as sarcasm ?
Any statement of fact that doesn't tip toe around those who are either trapped in a diabolical delusion or are ravening wolves trying to disguise themselves as sheep ?
John 17:9 "I ask on their behalf; I do not ask on behalf of the world, but of those whom You have given Me; for they are Yours;