Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: verga

I don’t think the ruling was actually about rights for sexual degenerates, was it? I seem to read it as a sweeping removal of states rights to define marriage and license same, shifting that power to the fed alone, without actually defining for the fed what shall be the new laws from fedzilla. Besides, defining a sexual degenerate like Kagan or Stevens as ‘catholic’ is a st-re-t-ch. Living in defiance of what God has defined an abomination doesn’t comport with the Catholic traditions or teachings, regardless of what the talking mule in Rome now says. Asa for Kennedy, well he is likely so senile that his clerks who are likely gay-riddled probably made his vote for him and write his issues.


309 posted on 06/29/2015 12:46:51 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
I agree with your assessments, the one I hold most culpable is Roberts.
315 posted on 06/29/2015 1:47:24 PM PDT by verga (I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson