[metmom]

Thus, historically, the title "Mother of God" was never intended to tell us something about Mary, but rather to tell us something about Jesus: that he is not two different persons.

And that intent failed miserably. Because they didn't use Scripture as they should have. And because the title *mother of God* doesn't mention Jesus as the title *mother of Jesus* does.

The best thing to counter error is not creating more error by renaming Mary as *mother of God* but to simply use Scripture to teach correctly about the nature of Jesus.

. And now people are getting led into more error than ever with all the false teachings about Mary that Catholicsm has promulgated.

[Mrs. Don-o]

That’s curious. You’ll notice nobody’s in error about the meaning of the term “Mother of God” except certain 16th century polemicists who, whether misled or misleading, misconstrued the term -— and their intellectual progeny.