The New Definition:
Anything creature that can slide its peepee into another creature should be allowed to be married according to the LGBT’ers because its all about feelings and has nothing to do with a holy institution set up by a sky fairy (their thoughts not mine).
Not just marriage, but also the very definition of men and women.
Having grown up in a hothouse of divorce and the spiritual/emotional chaos it brings, I love the simple beauty of “For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh,”
The definition of marriage as one man and one woman has been intact for millennia, and for good reason, as the author of the posted article points out. It's worth noting that with very few exceptions (those groups which permit polygamy), the traditional concept of marriage has been the standard everywhere around the world, from the most enlightened modern nations to the most backward and repressive, even in atheist cultures.
It would be sheer folly if the greatest nation on the planet changed its legal system to accommodate a perverse view, promulgated by radicals of the last decade, to the effect that homosexual liaisons should have the same legal standing as heterosexual unions.
How do created things like state-established definitions fit in the context of Romans 1:25+?
Neither side seems willing to acknowledge the self-evident Truth regarding why/how Nature selected Sex in the first place.
And because of this...
No society in the history of the world, to include Pagan Rome, ever legalized same-sex marriages. But Obama and US Supreme Court think they know more than all the great civilizations since the beginning of recorded history.