Posted on 06/22/2015 4:34:18 AM PDT by Yomin Postelnik
The New Definition:
Anything creature that can slide its peepee into another creature should be allowed to be married according to the LGBT’ers because its all about feelings and has nothing to do with a holy institution set up by a sky fairy (their thoughts not mine).
Not just marriage, but also the very definition of men and women.
Having grown up in a hothouse of divorce and the spiritual/emotional chaos it brings, I love the simple beauty of “For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh,”
The definition of marriage as one man and one woman has been intact for millennia, and for good reason, as the author of the posted article points out. It's worth noting that with very few exceptions (those groups which permit polygamy), the traditional concept of marriage has been the standard everywhere around the world, from the most enlightened modern nations to the most backward and repressive, even in atheist cultures.
It would be sheer folly if the greatest nation on the planet changed its legal system to accommodate a perverse view, promulgated by radicals of the last decade, to the effect that homosexual liaisons should have the same legal standing as heterosexual unions.
> The Supreme Court would be out of its collective mind if it declared that the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution’s “equal protection” and “due process” clauses mandate that every state in the union must allow “gay marriage.”
Gays don’t respect God, history, property rights, constitutional rights, common sense, etc...and the goes on and on. Like a spoiled child, they want what they want and don’t care anout the end effects on society. They just want it because you said they can’t have it. And they will engage in sodomy and unsafe sex because its what they do. Most sure seem to be sex addicts and whatever they need to accomplish the task of sexual satisfaction will be used even if it includes your children on a scouting trip. They are sick and twisted individuals.
“The definition of marriage as one man and one woman has been intact for millennia, and for good reason, as the author of the posted article points out.”
I have a question for the group. If they called it a civil union instead and had their “wedding” at City Hall and they didn’t violate the sanctity of the religious bond between a man and a woman, would that work?
Seems to me the issue is the word “Marriage.” I get that once again the left is playing with semantics to raise awareness to their voting block without regard to those of us offended by this.
However in saying that, if they called it civil union, partners forever or whatever, and did not use the word “Marriage”, if they kept the Church out of it, why should we care? If they are not practicing religion and doesn’t demand that the Church marry them then why does it matter to us?
If you are Godless, frankly I don’t care. That’s their issue not mine.
>>It would be sheer folly if the greatest nation on the planet changed its legal system to accommodate a perverse view
What does Romans 1:25+ say about when created things [like nations] become objects of worship?
>>Gays don’t respect...
...Biological FACT.
Nature selected Sex (the genetic exchange between male and female) because it increases fitness of species.
What homosexual activists have selected isn’t Sex, but the hedonistic (soon to be state-established) worship of mutual masturbation and themselves.
Supreme Court would be out of its collective mind
therein lies the rub
COLLECTIVE MIND!!
collective..or communal...?
How do created things like state-established definitions fit in the context of Romans 1:25+?
Neither side seems willing to acknowledge the self-evident Truth regarding why/how Nature selected Sex in the first place.
And because of this...
” the very definition of men and women.”
thats the card that the post modern camp...should not have played....
its seen as monumentally ludicrous by people all over the political map...and as the “left” has gotten behind all this inane gender HOOEY..they have painted themselves as they are....EVIL and FOOLISH.
this can and Must be used as a TOOL to TRANS-OUST the whole lot of them!!!
>>collective..or communal...?
Or corporate.
They all refer to the observable nature of humans to tend toward a hive mentality/organization.
In the Old Testament it was named Ba’al, a Hebrew word meaning Owner, Lord, Master, Possessor — typically rendered via theocratic state-establishment in which some fraudulent (Tzar/Ceasar/Kaisar/Pharaoh/Ne bu chad ne Zarian) man-god gets perched atop the state pyramid by the temple eunuchs [who being the brain-works of the farm deserve all the milk and apples].
No society in the history of the world, to include Pagan Rome, ever legalized same-sex marriages. But Obama and US Supreme Court think they know more than all the great civilizations since the beginning of recorded history.
“And they will engage in sodomy and unsafe sex because its what they do”.
And during any “Pride” march, they will dance naked in the streets and simulate acts of sodomy just to show the world how perverted they really are, and how “in love” they are. Sick, demented bastards, the whole lot of them.
Very well said - and blessings to you. You can learn the lessons from your home of birth and use them to establish a true and great home as man and wife.
So true. Hopefully G-d will help that Justice Kennedy sees it that way. He mentioned these key points in oral arguments.
The good news is we have G-d Almighty, and our own goodness (which is also created by and relies upon G-d) to rely on, fight back and educate.
> And during any “Pride” march, they will dance naked in the streets and simulate acts of sodomy just to show the world how perverted they really are, and how “in love” they are.
Unfortunately in DC I had to drive right through the middle of one and there were gays wearing nothing but net bodysuits that showed everything. There were also tour buses WITH children on them and I was wondering how many people were telling their children to close their eyes. I’m sure there were proably a few Lena Dunham types telling their kids to look and shake hands with their future role models though...I despise the LGBT activists. If they tell you they don’t want your children too they are lying. They are extreme perverts.
Be sure to stay out of downtown Chicago next Sunday, the day of the annual queer parade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.