ConclusionRegardless of what else the writer of this sermon believed, he did believe that all believers would be removed before the tribulation-a pre-trib rapture view. Thus, we have seen that those who have said that there was no one before 1830 who taught the pre-trib rapture position will have to revise their statements by well over 1,000 years. This statement does not prove the pre-trib position, only the Bible can do that, but it should change many people's historical views on the matter.
The entire paper is a fascinating read. The debate over the rapture has been going on since the days of Paul's mission trips.
I’ve read a few of Dr. Ice’s papers over the years. Some are very good but like all those prophecy ‘food fights’ he, as well as his opposition, tend to settle for taking pot shots at the opposing view and losing the focus of their argument.
The writings of this "Pseudo-Ephraem" are a stark contrast to what the true Ephraem wrote. The true Ephraem was very coherent and scholarly, false Ephraem just the opposite, utterly incoherent. If ever there was a unreliable document from ancient history, it is this one by false Ephraem. Modern Pretribs prove themselves as unscrupulous as false Ephraem by using such an unscrupulous plagarizer for their alleged "proof."
Trying to mimic the true Ephraem, this plagarizer is all over the board. In one place in his document he says things that "sound" to a modern pretrib ears as if he was pretrib, which modern pretribs pounce on to use as "proof," but, when you read on, you find him saying things which no pretrib would ever say.
This is what Bob Gundry, professor at Westmont College, Calif., says of the two Ephraems:
In Pseudo-Ephraems sermon, Christians lie buried during the tribulation. They are raised from the dead, meet the Lord after the tribulation, so that their meeting of the Lord Christ in the first supposedly pretrib passage, can hardly refer to a pretrib meeting without contradicting a good deal else in the sermon. Since Pseudo-Ephraem draws from true Ephraem, a look at true Ephraem offers guidelines for understanding Pseudo-Ephraems sermon. The guidelines turn out to be post rather than pretrib.
Gundry then proceeds to provide proof from the true Ephraems works, that the true Ephraem believed the same as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, etc., virtually the same belief (singular 2nd coming, post-trib rapture) as every individual who wrote in those ancient times.