[surroundedbyblue]

An ectopic pregnancy is not a viable one and often the child is dead before the diagnosis is even made.

Pro lifers need to stop using this situation as an example because it is not an abortion. Let’s be medically factual in our discussion

[If You Want It Fixed - Fix It]

A guy told me today that his girlfriend went in because she has an ectopic pregnancy and so the doctor said she needed to come here to take a pill.

What do you say to him? You don’t take a pill to kill the baby outside the womb, only inside. His girlfriend is lying to him.

Or her doctor is lying to her, them.

Wont go for a second opinion, like you would for any life or death operation, so he could be lying to me.

Lies, somewhere, to kill the baby. Even Judas didn’t to that.

Even that crime against humanity is forgiveable by Jesus, but contrition is a hard row to how...every day for the rest of your life you dred that decision....and that lie. Sad, but Mercy.

To the guy with the three “lines”....you too are welcomed to go out and be there for the women that don’t fall under your three lines! Laborers are needed!!!

[cotton]

Of course it is not thought of as an abortion, as there is no intent to kill a baby, but to save a life. Indeed some times the child is already deceased, but sometimes he or she was alive at the beginning of the procedure. I am sure you have seen the famous picture of the live fetus still in his/her amniotic sack. A miscarriage is called a spontaneous abortion. When an unborn dies and a d and c is required to remove the little body in is called a missed abortion. When a 29 week baby is removed from the womb and put in the intensive care unit it is called a premature birth, when he or she is purposely killed before birth it is called abortion. The difference is the intention to kill or to save. My point is the idea of saving not taking human life which is created at conception in the image of God, and is scared.