You all are the ones claiming they're spurious...not us. So, if you take issue with its up to YOU to refute it.
Hoss
The ability to CONSIDER and RECOGNIZE and LOGICALLY ENGAGE refutations is a precondition for any such attempt. And frankly, when you ignore the next two paragraphs of Campion which DO refute some of the nonsense of the OP, you don’t show that you have much in the way of ability and/or willingness, in that regard.
Care to address his comment about the ridiculous references to “magic” in the OP article, before you continue further with your demands for “refutations”?