it is taken directly from the protestant site
www.ccel.org
maybe your divinely inspired reading is better than theirs
It appears that my non-inspired reading is better than yours, since the statement that " Clement, who was ordained by Peter himself" is not what that site says, but only that this was "According to Tertullian."
Meanwhile, why is it, except as it is convenient for a strawman polemic, do RCs assume that since someone or thing is Protestant, then we necessarily should to give such credence, while on the other hand, RCs, as convenient, broadly define Protestant, and assert that they have no unity?
Schaff is an esteemed historian, not mainly because he is Protestant, but modern research has revealed things that even the best historians did not know. Thus even Catholic researchers and others provide testimony against the propaganda of the early church looking to Peter as the first of a line of supreme popes in Rome. while Peterinspired reading is better than, who was ordained by Peter himself If you actually read my response, you should have seen that aside from the Schaff does not make