From article:
“...there is a difference between development and contradiction.... It is one thing to use different language to teach something the church has always taught (e.g., the “Trinity”)..... It is another thing altogether to begin teaching something that the church ‘always denied’ (e.g., papal supremacy or infallibility). ....Those doctrines in particular were built on multitudes of forgeries.
the fruits of the papacy over 1,500 years have consistently been the precise opposite of the fruit of the Spirit (Matt. 7:16)
.............................................
RnMomo....what an interesting and informative article! Thank you for posting this. ;)
And completely false. Look at my post documenting that the Cardinal was quoted out of context.