Um...what’s posted above is an excerpt of the article. The author quotes the entire verse in the rest of the article, which you can find at the link provided. He presents the truncated verse as truncated, then elaborates on the cause of truncation, and then proceeds into the rest of the un-truncated verse. There’s nothing wrong with the article’s presentation - when you read the un-truncated article.
You’re complaining about truncation in a truncated article about truncation. I need a drink.
OH where is my LIKE button?? Your comment was great!