**The Scriptures I cited state that Mary gave birth to and is the mother of a child who:
is the child of the Holy Ghost
shall save his people from their sins
they shall call Emmanuel, which means God with us
shall be called the Son of the Highest
shall be called the Son of God
Elisabeth called “the mother of my Lord”
is a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord
is the Lord’s Christ
the wise men worshipped as the King of the Jews
All of these statements refer to..**
..the FACT that those statements prove the Son’s testamony to Philip and the rest of the disciples: “Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been SO LONG WITH YOU, and yet HAST THOU NOT KNOWN ME, Philip? he that hath seen me HATH seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? Believest thou NOT that I am IN the Father, and the Father IN me? the words I speak unto you I speak NOT of myself: but the Father that DWELLETH IN ME, HE doeth the works.” Jn 14:8-10
The power is sourced back to the Father. Mary made no divinity whatsoever.
**Elisabeth called “the mother of my Lord”**
The Son was made Lord, but not by Mary. Peter (the original subject of this thread) said that God hath made that same Jesus both Lord and Christ (Acts 2:36).
Mary made no divinity whatsoever.
Why do you put such a narrow definition on what a mother is? There is no denying that Mary made no divinity. No mother makes in her child what comes from the father. But a woman becomes a mother by the very fact of conceiving and giving birth to a child. And Mary did conceive and give birth to this child who is God in the second person of the Trinity.
Peter did say that God had made this same Jesus both Lord and Christ. This is the same Jesus that Elisabeth called “the mother of my LORD.”