[BlueDragon]

Well, dan my man, would you be feeling just bit whipsawed by the comments (and implications) shown contrasted between

comment #346

And

#351

?

Ok, it's not the greatest contrast available, or that I have seen on these pages (coming from FRomans) but it sort-a kind-of reminds me of http://www.romancatholicism.org/feeney-condemnations.html#a2 wherein Cardinal Marchetti-Selvaggiani and A. Ottaviani, Assessor, had to tie themselves in virtual pretzel knots when condemning Feeney (even as they were affirming Feeney's positions although they tried to say they were not by including little qualifiers here and there which betray how the Church of Rome seeks to have certain things two ways at once -- as long as they da' boss.)

[LurkingSince'98]

My question from lost 351 was never answered.

But whatever the answer I can only say, being a Romanist: thatsa nice.

Going to the park with the kids I wish all you protestants a great ‘Good Shepard Sunday’!

AMDG

[amihow]

Go through every “example” posted in #351and determine whether concerning faith, morals or discipline and science or math or astronomy or climate change or on and on. The faith and morals group may be infallibly taught by the Magisterium. The rest is not infallible.