We do in part, just as some RCs say they reject popes who required extermination of theological opponents by the sword of men, based on V2 inclusiveness, and other RCs reject popes who affirm Prot as brethren, based on past RC statements on exclusivity.
And if you really have been lurking since 98 then you should have seen both kinds here. One can call for a RC monarchy and the extermination of all Prots, commending the killing of men like Tyndale and the Spanish Inquisition, and the other can call us brethren and say that the past bloody attempts at extermination were wrong.
We do not know which kind of RC you are, but the difference is that our standard must be unchanging Scripture, not changeable Rome.
So when you reject some of what Luther taught, was it because you are ‘divinely inspired’ to reject some of what he, Luther, was ‘divinely inspired’ to reject??
So which human is responsible for arbiting whose ‘divine inspiration’ was more right than the other?
Such is the eternal failure of protestantism - you all get to choose what part of Luther you like and what part you reject.... and what parts of Scrpture mean what....and whether you are pre- or post- or whatever millenial you are.
Thats why thats nice.
For the Greater Glory of God