[The_Reader_David]

I remind everyone on the thread that some of the more stalwart Christian confession in terms of resistance to pansexualism (be it abortion to support fornication as a 'consequence free' amusement among those blind to eternal consequences, or the "LGBT..." strain of the same movement) are those which put a great stress on Holy Tradition -- the Orthodox, the Latins, and, though not represented much in the US, the Monophysites and Nestorians -- rather than regarding the Scriptures in the way the author proposes is the sole bulwark against such deviations from moral truth. There is a reason the Russian Orthodox Church has pushed the Duma to pass laws against "the propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations" and it's not an adherence to sola scriptura.

[kosciusko51]

I am glad that the many strains of "traditional" Christianity have rejected this nonsense. However, the denominations that have accepted this abomination do this because their beliefs have been elevated above the Word of God. It is not sola scriptura that has lead them to this belief, but it is the rejection of Scripture being the authoritative Word of God that has lead to this.