[ealgeone]

This discourse began with your statement:

>>The RCC has through history taught and then retracted several interpretations of scripture.<<

I asked you to cite examples of scripture that the Catholic Church retracted. You have posted general historical information about the Church, all of which are interesting but not the scriptural passages you assert the church has retracted. Can you please post these?

As catholics have told us so often, the Bible is not their final authority so we will "appeal" to their tradition where a number of doctrines have changed.

Prior to Vatican II all non-Catholic churchgoers will go to Hell.

That's a pretty big change.

[Eucharista]

"Prior to Vatican II all non-Catholic churchgoers will go to Hell."

That was never Church doctrine.

[NYer]

As catholics have told us so often, the Bible is not their final authority so we will "appeal" to their tradition where a number of doctrines have changed.

According to FATC, The RCC has through history taught and then retracted several interpretations of scripture.. I asked for examples of scripture that the Church has retracted.

You are now stating that the Catholic Church has changed a number of doctrines. While I am waiting for FATC to respond to the first request, I will ask you to cite specific examples of doctrines that the Catholic Church has changed.

Prior to Vatican II all non-Catholic churchgoers will go to Hell.

??? For what? Is this an example of what you purport to be a change of doctrine and, if so, which doctrine changed?