The roman Jesus born on December 25
Or the Hebrew Jesus born on a New Moon Day, one of His biblical appointed days?
The roman Jesus killed on Good Friday
Or the Hebrew Jesus slain as the Lamb on Passover, another appointed days He taught Israel?
The roman Jesus raised on easter Sunday
Or the Hebrew Jesus raised on the Feast of First Fruits, yet Another appointed day He taught Israel?
The roman Jesus’ story can’t be told without the catholic catechism.
There is a difference..
‘Anti’ doesn’t have to mean ‘opposed’ like it is today.
Anti can also mean ‘instead of’, ‘in place of’, substitute.
Makes the use of the greek word psuedo when detailing pseudo christs, pseudo prophets..
Apostle Paul spent no time teaching good friday, holy Saturday , easter Sunday.
He did teach passover lamb, unleavened bread, first fruits..
A subtle difference..
If Satan wasn’t described when dealing with eve as ‘subtle’, we wouldnt have much to test and prove in these end times..
Could a master counterfeiter pull off an identity theft of biblical proportions and counterfeit the genuine savior?
And turn him into a roman deity with a roman birthday and Roman holy days that only counterfeit what scripture actually records?
Rome’s Jesus story can only be told with Rome’s premises. Their catechism..
I suspect catholics and protestants dont think there can be another Jesus.
Scripture says that there can be. 2 Cor 11:4..
As His church progressed, they chose certain days to celebrate certain happenings...was Christ circumcised on Jan. 1st...chances are pretty great that there ws only a 1/365th chance of that, but we celebrate the occasion, not necessarily the date...who cares exactly what day it happened on...