Why is he soft on this topic? What isn’t he telling us about himself?
He should be pushed, and pushed, and pushed until he answers -— or dares not show his face in public again.
Another troublesome Bishop.
The pudgy pink prelate has not been taught how to face the camera. He also indulged in a no-no with finger pointing at the interviewer, treating him (and the audience, if any) as a deranged 6th grader.
He also got around to saying absolutely nothing in several thousand words about homosexuality, etc. etc. Said nothing substantive about Islam, but what splendid chaps those moderate Muslims were. And in general, qualified himself as NYC Minister of Cults in the DeBlasio Régime. Seriously, the Pope ought to consider trading this guy to the Unity Church for a utility softball platitude pitcher yet to be named. He did claim that he was an historian at least 5 times. He did NOT, I am happy to report, attempt to indulge in his stage Irishman Dennis Day Act with Pat'n'Mike jokes, etc.
O well, he does have better diction than Al Sharpton.
I believe he told us all we need to know when he fired the school teacher for her FB post on the truth of the matter, where the Church stands against homosexuality.
This same bishop called her remarks, “intemperate”, and summarily fired her. I mean, she used exclamation marks!!!
I read her post. What she said was true and accurate and were not intemperate. But, oh, those exclamation marks must have deemed it “intemperate”!!
Now you see him shifting the blame to Pope Francis, putting words in his mouth he never said, that I know of, though heaven knows he has said plenty.
But this bishop behaves as a coward trying to bury his conscience and hides to avoid discussing his dissident behavior.
I think we know quite enough, without having to guess or wonder.