In the year 110AD Catholicism WAS the entire Christian community....sheesh
Not roman catholicism....no, sir. That edifice came about a bit later....sheesh.
Essentially assumes what you are trying to prove, as well as assuming facts not in evidence.
Explanation: Your whole case rests on Catholicism being a corruption of authentic, original Christianity. Our whole case rests on it being an authentic development of authentic, original Christianity. Baldly asserting one position or another is not actually proving anything.