Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o; ealgeone; CynicalBear

.
The ekklesia of the first century is no different than the ekklesia today.

Invisible, meeting whenever two or more are gathered in Yeshua’s name (not in the name of the ‘Mary’ spirit for sure!)

We know for sure that the RCC has no part in that ekklesia, as its attributes are those of the tares that the apostles put out of their midst as soon as they showed their nature.

Mammon is not compatible with Yeshua’s ekklesia, nor is a collection of art treasures nor phallus bedecked palaces.
.


81 posted on 04/08/2015 12:43:45 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor; Mrs. Don-o; ealgeone

It would take a long post to list all the things that eliminate the Catholic Church as representative of the ekklesia of Christ.


91 posted on 04/08/2015 4:42:00 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson