To: ebb tide; marshmallow
I'm going to stick my neck out here and say it was set up that way so that the dissenters can have the fullest possible "say," and emboldened by their perceived power, thus reveal the depth of their apostasy and be well and truly refuted.
Why were Arians invited to Nicaea?
4 posted on
03/29/2015 10:01:37 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Come, Holy Spirit, fill the hearts of Thy faithful, and kindle in them the fire of Thy love.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Well, at that time, St. Nicholas was also invited to Nicea. And we all know what he did to Arius.
Yet this time, a great defender of the Catholic Faith, Cardinal Burke, has not been re-invited.
Long rope, short branch just won’t cut it.
5 posted on
03/29/2015 10:08:56 AM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
it was set up that way so that the dissenters can have the fullest possible "say," and emboldened by their perceived power, thus reveal the depth of their apostasy and be well and truly refuted.Either that or you're whistling past the graveyard.
6 posted on
03/29/2015 10:10:31 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Doctrine doesn't change. The trick is to find a way around it.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
I'm going to stick my neck out here and say it was set up that way so that the dissenters can have the fullest possible "say," and emboldened by their perceived power, thus reveal the depth of their apostasy and be well and truly refuted.But weren't they all already fully exposed to Pope Francis at the first SinNod? Since then, have any heads rolled besides Burke's?
Is not the heretic, Cardinal Balderserri, again leading the follow-up Sin-Nod of Sodomy?
10 posted on
03/29/2015 10:27:22 AM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
I think there may something to that line of thought.
To: Mrs. Don-o
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson